[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: The magical mystical changing ethernet interface order
    On 08 May 2003 22:46:26 +0100 Alan Cox <> wrote:

    | On Iau, 2003-05-08 at 20:32, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
    | > My belief is that configuration scripts should be specified in
    | > term of MAC address (or subset) and not in term of device name. Just
    | > like the Pcmcia scripts are doing it.
    | > And let's go the extra mile : ifconfig should accept a MAC
    | > address as the argument instead of a device name. And in the long
    | > term, just get rid of device name from the user view.
    | Current Red Hat supports naming interfaces by their mac address. That
    | keeps most people happy except some sparc and embedded users who have
    | one mac per host not per card (and yes that *is* allowed by the
    | 802.x spec)

    Yep, found it in IEEE Std 802-2001. It's just not the recommended
    method for device address assignment.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.020 / U:1.804 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site