[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH[[2.5][3-11] update dvb subsystem core
    On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 11:19:30AM +0200, Michael Hunold wrote:
    > The code does not behave differently. If DVB_DEVFS_ONLY is set, then the
    > old chardev register interface is omitted.

    Which is a different behaviour, now you can't create a device node
    manually anymor. Also note that the feature you rely on here (devfs
    presetting file->private_data) will go away in the next round of patches,
    see Al Viro's patchit for a generic replacement that works with or
    without devfs.

    > > Just removing this makes the code even more incorrect. You need to
    > > add a ->owner member and call try_module_get on it before calling into
    > > the module (and handle the return value..)
    > There is a functional dependency between the dvb-core and the actual dvb
    > driver. So there is no need to increase the module count of the dvb-core
    > if a new adapter is registered IMHO, because you cannot unload the
    > dvb-core before the driver anyway.

    Okay, you're right I should have read more of the code to get the global
    picture. You still wan't an owner field for at least struct dvb_device
    device, though - but the try_module_get must go into dvb_generic_open
    and maybe in more other places where you use the "backend" modules.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.022 / U:2.612 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site