[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kmalloc_percpu
In message <> you write:
> Rusty Russell <> wrote:
> >
> > I figured that since the allocator is going to be there anyway, it
> > made sense to express kmalloc_percpu() in those terms. If you think
> > the price is too high, I can respect that.
> I suggest that we use your new mechanism to fix DEFINE_PERCPU() in modules,
> and leave kmalloc_percpu() as it is for now.

Sure, we can revisit it later if it makes sense. After all, there's
supposed to be this freeze thing...

I'll prepare a new, minimal patch.

Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.099 / U:0.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site