Messages in this thread |  | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kmalloc_percpu | Date | Thu, 08 May 2003 10:53:48 +1000 |
| |
In message <20030506223751.2b49024a.akpm@digeo.com> you write: > Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > > > > I figured that since the allocator is going to be there anyway, it > > made sense to express kmalloc_percpu() in those terms. If you think > > the price is too high, I can respect that. > > I suggest that we use your new mechanism to fix DEFINE_PERCPU() in modules, > and leave kmalloc_percpu() as it is for now.
Sure, we can revisit it later if it makes sense. After all, there's supposed to be this freeze thing...
I'll prepare a new, minimal patch.
Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |