lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kmalloc_percpu
Date
In message <20030506223751.2b49024a.akpm@digeo.com> you write:
> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > I figured that since the allocator is going to be there anyway, it
> > made sense to express kmalloc_percpu() in those terms. If you think
> > the price is too high, I can respect that.
>
> I suggest that we use your new mechanism to fix DEFINE_PERCPU() in modules,
> and leave kmalloc_percpu() as it is for now.

Sure, we can revisit it later if it makes sense. After all, there's
supposed to be this freeze thing...

I'll prepare a new, minimal patch.

Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.099 / U:0.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site