[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: top stack (l)users for 2.5.69

Jesse Pollard wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 May 2003 12:13, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> [snip]
>>One thing that would help (aside from separate interrupt stacks)
>>would be a guard page below the stack. That wouldn't require any
>>physical memory to be reserved, and would provide positive indication
>>of stack overflow without significant runtime overhead.
> It does take up a page table entry, which may also be in short supply

Now, I'm sure this has GOT to be a terribly ignorant question, but I'll
try anyhow:

What happens if you simply neglect to provide a mapping for that page?
I'm sure that will cause some sort of page fault. Why would you have to
do something different?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean