Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 07 May 2003 12:03:35 -0700 | From | Ulrich Drepper <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH]: DELAYTIMER_MAX is defined |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
george anzinger wrote: > Andrew Morton suggested > an rlimit for that. Perhaps that is what should be used here also. > > Seem reasonable?
For this as well? We are getting an awful lot of these it seems.
The DELAYTIMER_MAX thing probably can be hardcoded. I can see no harm in limiting it to 1000 or so. The number of timers can be handled via rlimit.
- -- - --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `--------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+uViH2ijCOnn/RHQRApl3AKC6l4zZMsn7SaiGSw6hb9KZpc5cQACgm1NW 09sC2WWGZsw1QAUxcTjo8rI= =Nafv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |