[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: tg3 - irq #: nobody cared!
    "David S. Miller" <> wrote:
    > On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 15:03, john stultz wrote:
    > > Not sure if this is the proper fix, but it stops the kernel from
    > > complaining. I saw Andrew suggest something similar for a sound driver.
    > Definitely not the right fix. If the hardware status struct
    > indicates no event is pending, then we return 0 since we
    > didn't "handle" the interrupt.

    This is about the fifth report of unhandled interrupts. Against the fifth
    driver which looks to be correct.

    So I'd be suspecting the scenario which Alan outlined: the IRQ handler looped
    around, scooped up the interrupt source before the APIC delivered the IRQ.

    I'm working on the actual detection code - it tries to filter out the false

    Suggest we ignore these reports until that is sorted out.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.021 / U:0.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site