Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.5.69 just doesn't boot (neither does anything > .67) | From | Daniel Pittman <> | Date | Tue, 06 May 2003 23:26:02 +1000 |
| |
On Tue, 6 May 2003, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Brett wrote:
[...]
>> and anyway, can you provide any backup that this will fix it ?? what >> changed between 2.5.66 and 2.5.67 to stop grub loading the kernel ? >> why hasn't anyone else reported this ??? > > I couldn't boot 2.5 at all until I upgraded an ancient grub. Having > a recent bootloader is never a bad thing though, and 0.92 is pretty > old.
0.92 is successfully booting 2.5.6[89] here, and 0.93 (Debian or upstream) fails to boot on most of my machines here.
YMMV, of course, but 0.92 works for me.
Daniel
-- Don't join the book burners. Don't think you are going to conceal faults by concealing evidence they ever existed. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |