[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: The disappearing sys_call_table export.
    temper, temper

    pls read my reply to alan carefully .

    Doing own malloc(), free(), m[un]map(), is a possibility we've
    considered. Since we've got our own lib linked with the app, we probably
    wouldn't even need LD_PRELOAD. our main issue is that not everything is

    Of all the approaches the syscall traps was the least intrusive and most
    portable of all, belive it or not.

    BTW: this is all technical issues.

    On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 14:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

    > That only shows that you really don't want to use glibc's malloc and
    > sbrk implementations, but ones that are implemented as mmap in your
    > driver so you can keep track of it properly. LD_PRELOAD is your friend.

    > Who cares about your trace module? That's the wrong approach to start
    > with. And the removal of the sys_call_table export is not a political
    > issue but a technical one. The interesting thing would be your memory
    > manager, but given the above hints you really should be able to fix it yourself
    > now..

    Terje Eggestad
    Scali Scalable Linux Systems

    Olaf Helsets Vei 6 tel: +47 22 62 89 61 (OFFICE)
    P.O.Box 150, Oppsal +47 975 31 574 (MOBILE)
    N-0619 Oslo fax: +47 22 62 89 51

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.021 / U:137.908 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site