[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: The disappearing sys_call_table export.
On Llu, 2003-05-05 at 10:33, Terje Eggestad wrote:
> 1. performance is everything.

Then you can live with building custom patched kernels

> 2. We're making a MPI library, and as such we don't have any control
> with the application.


> 3c. It's therefore necessary for HW to access user pages.

Like TV cards do. That isnt hard

> 4. In order to to 3, the user pages must be pinned down.
> 5. the way MPI is written, it's not using a special malloc() to allocate
> the send receive buffers. It can't since it would break language binding
> to fortran. Thus ANY writeable user page may be used.

Well not all the pages are guaranteed DMAable, so I guess you already

> 10. kernel patches are impractical, I must be able to do this with std
> stock, redhat, AND suse kernels.

So you want every vendor to screw up their kernels and the base kernel
for an obscure (but fun) corner case. Thats not a rational choice is it.
You want "performance is everything" you pay the price, don't make
everyone suffer.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.104 / U:0.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site