Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Kernel hot-swap using Kexec, BProc and CC/SMP Clusters. | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | Date | Mon, 05 May 2003 14:17:57 -0400 |
| |
On Mon, 05 May 2003 12:00:15 MDT, Steven Cole said:
> Perhaps two uptimes could be kept. The current concept of uptime would > remain as is, analogous to the reign of a king (the current kernel), and > a new integrated uptime would be analogous to the life of a dynasty. The > dynasty uptime would be one of the many things the new kernel learned > about on booting. This new dynasty uptime could become quite long if > everything keeps on ticking.
Make sure you handle the case of a dynasty that starts on a 2.7.13 kernel and is finally deposed by a power failure in 2.7.39.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |