Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 30 May 2003 06:12:12 +0200 | From | Bongani Hlope <> | Subject | Re: 2.5.70-mm1 Strangeness |
| |
On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:51:35 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com> wrote:
> "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com> > > Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 13:55:41 -0700 > > > > The ip_dst_cache seems unreasonably large. Unless your desktop is a > > backbone router or something. > > > > Lots of DST entries can result on any machine actually. We create one > > per source address, not just per destination address. So if you talk > > to a lot of sites, or lots of sites talk to you, you'll get a lot of > > DST entries. > > > > Regardless, 80MB _IS_ excessive. That's nearly 400,000 entries. > > It definitely indicates there is a leak somewhere. > > > > Although it say: > > > > ip_dst_cache 19470 19470 4096 1 1 > > > > Which is 19470 active objects right? > > Yes, 19470 entries. But note that each entry is 4096 bytes. > > Something seems to have gone and bumped the object size from 240 bytes up > to 4096. This is actually what I want CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC to do, but I > don't think it does it yet. > > Bongani, if you have CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC enabled then please try turning > it off. And maybe Manfred can throw some light on what slab has done > there.
Cool, I'll let you know how it goes. I'll also try davem,s suggestion about /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/max_size [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |