[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: buffer_head.b_bsize type
    On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 03:35:03AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
    >> Could we go the other way and make all users of b_size use unsigned?

    On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 12:15:17PM +0100, wrote:
    > Who the hell cares? Size of buffer does not exceed the page size.
    > Unless you can show a platform with 2Gb pages...

    The thought behind my comment was that it didn't make sense to allow
    the representation to go negative. There of course shouldn't ever be
    any need to allow >= 2GB b_size to be representable.

    I'll defer to viro here.

    -- wli
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.027 / U:53.396 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site