[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Two patches - ptrace single stepping + modpost.c
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 12:58:53PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> Other architectures which use similar schemes (eg, alpha) might also
> like this; it looks like Alpha may be a little buggy; it appears
> to carry the single stepping status across signal handling. What
> happens if the debugger decides to disable single stepping when
> the debugged process receives a signal?

Alpha was buggy, indeed. Hopefully fixed in current bk.
However, we don't need special flag for single stepping - we use
thread_info->bpt_nsaved as such flag.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.024 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site