Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 19 May 2003 15:56:39 -0400 | From | Arthur Perry <> | Subject | Re: Sorry if this question is the beaten dead horse |
| |
Aww geesh.
I am such a fool. All I have to say is 'less ./Documentation/Changes'. I will give this a go first before I send another silly email. remember to RTFM. ;)
Sorry about that.
Been a while since I had to read the kernel user's readmes.
Arthur Perry wrote: > Hello All, > > I have a question, sorry if it is totally out of this league. > I have been trying to compile a 2.5 kernel with modules support for a > while, and have always been unsuccessful. > There are always unresolved symbols. > Always. Tons of em. If I didn't know any better, I'd say all of them of > which I tried to compile as modules. > I am not a newbie to Linux, I have been putting together distros for > over 6 years, but the past year or two I have been maintaining stable > releases in production environments. > Just recently, I have tried to build the 2.5 tree, adn I know I am > missing something. > > I am using Slackware 9.0, which is glibc 2.3.1 and gcc 3.2.2. > Modutils 2.4.25 with Rusty's module-init-tools-0.9.12. > It is mostly Vanilla otherwise. > > I know I must be missing a lot of tools and system-side changes to > accomodate a 2.5 kernel, and I have been trying to identify what they are. > > No need to get too specific, I have been categorically a kernel "user" > for quite some time (just not a 2.5 one), so I just need quick info and > links. > > > Thanks in advance!! > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |