[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: time interpolation hooks
On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 15:00, David Mosberger wrote:
> Andrew> (Those function pointers should go away in favour of
> Andrew> optionally-stubbed-out static calls. Minor point).
> Really? On ia64, we want to use cycle-based interpolation by default,
> but if firmware indicates that the cycle-counters may drift, we want
> to switch to one of several possible external counters (which counter
> gets used depends on hardware/drivers are is present).

I think Andrew is really suggesting to declare these two things
in an arch header, so if one needs it to be a function pointer one
can make it so.

David S. Miller <>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.102 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site