Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: time interpolation hooks | From | "David S. Miller" <> | Date | 16 May 2003 19:38:01 -0700 |
| |
On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 15:00, David Mosberger wrote: > Andrew> (Those function pointers should go away in favour of > Andrew> optionally-stubbed-out static calls. Minor point). > > Really? On ia64, we want to use cycle-based interpolation by default, > but if firmware indicates that the cycle-counters may drift, we want > to switch to one of several possible external counters (which counter > gets used depends on hardware/drivers are is present).
I think Andrew is really suggesting to declare these two things in an arch header, so if one needs it to be a function pointer one can make it so.
-- David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |