lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: APIC error
From
Hi,

On: Thu, 15 May 2003 12:09:38 +0200 (CEST),
Jos Hulzink <josh@toad.stack.nl> wrote:
> > No load balancing of I/O interrupts since they will all be directed to
> > CPU 0 only. Unless your dual P5 is servicing a lot of interrupts, I doubt
> > it will make a noticeable difference.
>
> On my Dual PII 333, KDE 3.1 runs fine with interrupts mapped to both CPUs,
> and performance is horrible when only CPU0 receives the interrupts.
>
> Especially moving the timer interrupt to both CPUs makes difference like
> night and day.

Thanks for all your contributions ;-) But with noapic I also get APIC
errors from time to time (altough /etc/intrerrupts shows that the
XT-PIC is used). But anyway the box is not running very reliable in
both modes and processes seg-fault every now and then and sometimes
the box freezed. I'll get rid of the box I got for free and no longer
waste our time ... ;-)

> Jos

Sincerely,
René Rebe

--
René Rebe - Europe/Germany/Berlin
rene@rocklinux.org rene.rebe@gmx.net
http://www.rocklinux.org http://www.rocklinux.org/people/rene
http://gsmp.tfh-berlin.de/gsmp http://gsmp.tfh-berlin.de/rene
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.041 / U:0.676 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site