Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 May 2003 12:25:00 +0200 (CEST) | Subject | Re: APIC error | From | Rene Rebe <> |
| |
Hi,
On: Thu, 15 May 2003 12:09:38 +0200 (CEST), Jos Hulzink <josh@toad.stack.nl> wrote: > > No load balancing of I/O interrupts since they will all be directed to > > CPU 0 only. Unless your dual P5 is servicing a lot of interrupts, I doubt > > it will make a noticeable difference. > > On my Dual PII 333, KDE 3.1 runs fine with interrupts mapped to both CPUs, > and performance is horrible when only CPU0 receives the interrupts. > > Especially moving the timer interrupt to both CPUs makes difference like > night and day.
Thanks for all your contributions ;-) But with noapic I also get APIC errors from time to time (altough /etc/intrerrupts shows that the XT-PIC is used). But anyway the box is not running very reliable in both modes and processes seg-fault every now and then and sometimes the box freezed. I'll get rid of the box I got for free and no longer waste our time ... ;-)
> Jos
Sincerely, René Rebe
-- René Rebe - Europe/Germany/Berlin rene@rocklinux.org rene.rebe@gmx.net http://www.rocklinux.org http://www.rocklinux.org/people/rene http://gsmp.tfh-berlin.de/gsmp http://gsmp.tfh-berlin.de/rene - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |