[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> hpa wrote:
>>How about creating a master option like we have for experimental?
>>Something like "Allow removal of essential components?" (CONFIG_EMBEDDED)
> ...and that just enables another option: "REALLY allow removal of
> essential components?" (CONFIG_REALLY_EMBEDDED)
> :)

Reminds me of CONFIG_MORON back in December 2000

-dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_NTFS_RW
+dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_MORON
+dep_bool ' Are you sure? I hope you dont care about your NTFS


And the mailer looked at the patch and, behold, it was good. And the
mailer decided to wrap the patch.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.083 / U:0.976 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site