Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 15 May 2003 00:59:47 +0200 | From | Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional |
| |
Chuck Ebbert wrote: > hpa wrote: > > >>How about creating a master option like we have for experimental? >>Something like "Allow removal of essential components?" (CONFIG_EMBEDDED) > > > ...and that just enables another option: "REALLY allow removal of > essential components?" (CONFIG_REALLY_EMBEDDED) > > :)
Reminds me of CONFIG_MORON back in December 2000
-dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_NTFS_RW $CONFIG_NTFS_FS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL +dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_MORON $CONFIG_NTFS_FS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL +dep_bool ' Are you sure? I hope you dont care about your NTFS filesystems' CONFIG_NTFS_RW $CONFIG_MORON
;)
Carl-Daniel -- And the mailer looked at the patch and, behold, it was good. And the mailer decided to wrap the patch.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |