lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional
Date
Followup to:  <Pine.LNX.4.55.0305141342030.4539@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com>
By author: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Not only. Like Ulrich was saying, the config documentation should heavily
> warn the wild config guy about the consequences of a 'NO' over there.
>

How about creating a master option like we have for experimental?
Something like "Allow removal of essential components?" (CONFIG_EMBEDDED)

-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans