lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional
    Date
    Followup to:  <Pine.LNX.4.55.0305141342030.4539@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com>
    By author: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
    In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
    >
    > Not only. Like Ulrich was saying, the config documentation should heavily
    > warn the wild config guy about the consequences of a 'NO' over there.
    >

    How about creating a master option like we have for experimental?
    Something like "Allow removal of essential components?" (CONFIG_EMBEDDED)

    -hpa
    --
    <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
    "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
    Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.020 / U:0.680 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site