[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: supermount
On Mer, 2003-05-14 at 14:41, ismail donmez wrote:
> Yeah I wonder the same for some time . Is there a good reason not to include supermount in kernel?

Its not considered of sufficient quality currently, and has or had races
that were not fixed. I'm sure Juan will submit it post 2.6 if he gets it
to a polished state

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.038 / U:0.560 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site