[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subjectit is a lab environment
> > The switching table is
> > messed up by the intense traffic, we believe. Other cheaper switches
> > (netgear fast esthernet switch FS108 ) have the same problem.
> What do you mean by "intense traffic?" Many switches will get
> confused if you fill their tables with a large number of different
> addresses. Is someone maybe spoofing MAC addresses on your net?
> Or is the switch plugged into a larger switched network where it will
> see many different MAC addresses on the uplink port?

By Intense traffic I mean that the traffic on one path through the
switch is a little more than 10mb/s.

My testing enviroment is an isolated lab environment. I only use
4 ports and the uplink port is not used. Each of the 4 ports is
connected to one ethernet card. That is why I concluded that the
10mb/s traffic is intense since for the first 5 minutes the switch is a
switch and then becomes a hub.

As I said, I used a little expensive swicth (also auto-sensing
dumb one) and solved the problem. That is why I concluded a very cheap
swicth (<$100) may be not good in some scenarios. Of course for household
it is definitely a good choice.

Xinwen Fu
P.S. I only intend to provide some information and all my testing is for
a rigid academic objective.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.055 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site