Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 11 May 2003 09:17:36 -0400 (EDT) | From | Zwane Mwaikambo <> | Subject | Re: irq balancing: performance disaster |
| |
On Sun, 11 May 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Sun, 11 May 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > >> I vaguely like this notion because it removes a #ifdef and cleans up > >> a tiny bit of its surroundings. But it's not quite a one-liner. > > On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 08:58:57AM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > Nice, it's during init too so there really is no need for any sort of > > optimisation, the inline can also go and make it __init. > > Very good point. The static variable in an inline function is very fishy > also. Here it is:
Cool, could you send it to Marcelo?
> - case CLUSTERED_APIC_XAPIC: > - /*round robin the interrupts*/ > - cpu = (cpu+1)%smp_num_cpus; > - return cpu_to_physical_apicid(cpu);
Side note, any idea what the largest x440 this has code has run on?
-- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |