Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 12 May 2003 01:32:10 +0300 (IDT) | From | Yoav Weiss <> | Subject | Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export. |
| |
> Not on the systems I've seen. Max log file size is 4GB and the > logs are on their own partition. If the file fills up the system > crashes immediately and only administrators can log in after reboot > until the logs are archived.
Why would anyone design a system like that ?! The logging of every security system is prone to flooding. You may have noticed that your syslog sometimes spits "Last message repeated N times" so it won't repeat itself. A system that doesn't deal with this issue in any way can't be secure. There are a lot of methods to deal with it but I think we're going seriously off-topic here so if anyone wishes to continue discussing this specific logging problem, I suggest we switch to non-lkml mode.
> Yes, but now any unsuccessful attempts to change the name will be > logged, where before there was basically no risk for the attacker > trying over and over until success. Even a single failure could > raise an alert on the target machine, something a cracker definitely > does not want to happen. >
Not necessarily - it depends on the case. If the file being unlinked is the logfile itself, and its checked by an cron job every once in a while (a common situation), an attacker won't mind making a lot of noise into the soon-to-be-a-free-inode logfile. After-the-fact security systems are usually not suitable for server protection, and the system you suggest, being statistical, is after-the-fact by definition.
Yoav Weiss
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |