[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Use correct x86 reboot vector
    On Sunday 11 May 2003 05:50, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On Sat, 10 May 2003, Jamie Lokier wrote:
    > > Jos Hulzink wrote:
    > > > For the sake of bad behaving BIOSes however, I'd vote for the f000:fff0
    > > > vector, unless someone can hand me a paper that says it is wrong.
    > >
    > > I agree, for the simple reason that it is what the chip does on a
    > > hardware reset signal.
    > Hmm.. Doesnt' a _real_ hardware reset actually use a magic segment that
    > isn't even really true real mode? I have this memory that the reset value
    > for a i386 has CS=0xf000, but the shadow base register actually contains
    > 0xffff0000. In other words, the CPU actually starts up in "unreal" mode,
    > and will fetch the first instruction from physical address 0xfffffff0.
    > At least that was true on an original 386. It's something that could
    > easily have changed since.
    > In other words, you're all wrong. Nyaah, nyaah.
    > Linus

    Source: 80386 Programmers Reference Manual, Intel (1986)

    EIP is set 0000FFF0H
    CS is set F000H

    After RESET, lines A31-A20 are FORCED high till a far JMP is done.

    So, unfortunately we have to say Linus is right once again. Damn ;-) My
    conclusion is that we are unable to use the CPU reset as the reference for
    warm boots, for we can't control A312-A20 in real mode. But as far as I can
    see, my arguments still hold...

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.022 / U:168.244 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site