Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 01 May 2003 06:09:09 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: Remains of seq_file conversion for DECnet, plus fixes | From | "David S. Miller" <> |
| |
From: Steven Whitehouse <steve@gw.chygwyn.com> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 15:04:00 +0100 (BST)
> About update_pmtu(). You are not required to implement this. > All of these places you see dereferencing dst->update_mtu() > know that they have an ipv4/ipv6 route. Or do you know some > exception to this?
I was thinking of that bit of code in ip_gre.c which I sent the fix for recently. Unless I've missed something it calls update_pmtu on the dst which is passed by the encapsulated protocol, although I've not actually tested that. Thats the reason I wasn't sure about the fix which I sent... it deleted the duplicated call only for IPv4 rather than the one which appears to get called for every protocol as I wasn't sure what was intended. No, this must be an IPV4 or an IPV6 route. Right Alexey? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |