Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 May 2003 22:54:10 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: Remains of seq_file conversion for DECnet, plus fixes |
| |
Em Thu, May 01, 2003 at 02:22:35PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: > From: Steven Whitehouse <steve@gw.chygwyn.com> > Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 22:35:46 +0100 (BST)
> > The name is a bit generic for an export function. What about > > seq_release_kfree?
> Yes, I'd considered that and eventually settled for the non-prefixed > version since it followed the pattern set by single_release() which > doesn't have the seq_ prefix. I don't mind changing it though if the > prefixed version is preferred,
> I think a naming convention without a prefix is asking for > trouble. I'd ask that you add the prefix, the current convention > is troublesome and someone ought to clean that up.
Agreed, I also tought of adding it as a generic function, that is the spirit of ip_seq_release, that is already used several net/ipv4 seq_file routines and should be deleted in favour of seq_release_private, that is my preferred name, as it is more general.
- Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |