lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [LTP] Re: Same syscall is defined to different numbers on 3 different archs(was Re: Makefile issue)
    From
    Date
    On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 21:23, Werner Almesberger wrote:
    > Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > #include </path/to/kernel/source/include/asm-<arch>/unistd.h>
    > > (you need the version in the kernel source because many glibc packagers
    > > in their infinite wisdom use an old outdated copy of asm/ usually from
    > > the last stable kernel only)
    >
    > Do we need a /proc/syscalls ? :-)
    I don't think so. Apps should be accessing things through libraries
    anyway. The only reason we don't in some cases like this is that it's
    new and not in libs on any distro yet. Besides, I don't think having a
    /proc/syscalls would be any better than having to do ifdefs or use
    kernel headers.

    -Paul Larson

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:6.510 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site