[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: PATCH: MTRR save and restore.

    [I added l-k to the cc list].

    > > > We could add it to suspend scripts, but wouldn't mtrrs fit into the
    > > > driver model idea? Would you say the same thing about implementing S3
    > > > support?
    > >
    > > I think going through the driver model is the right thing to
    > > do.
    > It's useless bloat.
    > > Userspace should not need to know about mtrrs,
    > It's a swsuspend helper daemon, not some random application. There
    > *should* be a helper daemon, if not, the design is flawed.

    There's no helper daemon, nor I plan to make one. Notice that mtrr
    stuff is shared between S3 (== suspend to ram) and swsusp. Both S3 and
    swsusp can be used to do some pretty important stuff (machine
    overheats or battery critically low -> suspend somewhere), so I do not
    think userland daemon is good idea.

    It can be dependend on CONFIG_PM; if you still think that's too much
    bloat, it could be dependend on CONFIG_SLEEP which could be only
    compiled when S3 or swsusp is selected (but I feel that would be

    When do you have heart between your knees?
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.020 / U:17.752 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site