lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Same syscall is defined to different numbers on 3 different archs(was Re: Makefile issue)
From
Date

The original note had the testcases in question, which uses
_syscall3......but since this was left off I'll summarize. The author did
use the following:

_syscall3 (int, timer_create, clockid_t, which_clock, struct sigevent *,
timer_event_spec, timer_t *, timer_id);

but compilation failed with:

timer_delete01.c: In function `timer_create':
timer_delete01.c:86: `__NR_timer_create' undeclared (first use in this
function)

The only way we were able to resolve this was to either to add the kernel
includes to the include path: "-I /usr/src/linux-2.5.66/include".
Obviously, this option will not work for the LTP and our users who
frequently change kernel levels and install locations, we have to use "such
ugly, platform-dependent code"

- Robbie

Robert V. Williamson <robbiew@us.ibm.com>
Linux Test Project
IBM Linux Technology Center
Phone: (512) 838-9295 T/L: 678-9295
Fax: (512) 838-4603
Web: http://ltp.sourceforge.net
IRC: #ltp on freenode.irc.net
====================
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein



David Mosberger
<davidm@napali.hp To: Robert Williamson/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
l.hp.com> cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, aniruddha.marathe@wipro.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
04/07/2003 01:08 Subject: Re: Same syscall is defined to different numbers on 3 different archs(was
PM Re: Makefile issue)
Please respond to
davidm





>>>>> On Mon, 7 Apr 2003 11:26:49 -0500, "Robert Williamson"
<robbiew@us.ibm.com> said:

Robert> Hmmm...so I guess the only viable solution for a single test
Robert> to cover as many archs as possible, is to explicitly define
Robert> the number for each arch.

Robert> Here's how I would do it Aniruddha:
Robert> ------------------------------------------
Robert> #ifdef __i386__
Robert> #define __NR_timer_create 259
Robert> #endif

Robert> #ifdef __x86_64__
Robert> #define __NR_timer_create 222
Robert> #endif

Robert> #if defined(__ppc__) || defined(__ppc64__)
Robert> #define __NR_timer_create 240
Robert> #else /* Not defined on this architecture */

Robert> #include "test.h"
Robert> #include "usctest.h"

Robert> int TST_TOTAL = 0; /* Total number of testcases */

Robert> int main()
Robert> {
Robert> tst_resm(TCONF,"This system call is not defined for this
architecture.");
Robert> tst_exit();
Robert> /* NOT REACHED */
Robert> return(0);
Robert> }
Robert> #endif /* Not defined on this architecture */

Robert> <REST OF TEST HERE>
Robert> ------------------------------------------

Robert> Any comments???

Why use such ugly, platform-dependent code when syscall(3) will do it
just fine? (AFAIK, there is no man-page for syscall(3), but the glibc
info manual documents it in detail.)

--david




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.059 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site