| Date | Sun, 06 Apr 2003 09:13:04 -0700 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: objrmap and vmtruncate |
| |
>> > 14.91s user 75.30s system 24% cpu 6:15.84 total >> >> Isn't the intent to use sys_remap_file_pages for these sort of workloads >> anyway? In which case partial objrmap = rmap for these tests, so we're >> still OK? > > What matters is the worst case not the best case. Users will do non > optimal things on a regular basis.
Humpf. Well I have a fairly simple plan to fix it now. I'll either publish some code or the plan later today, once I've thought about it a bit more.
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|