lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: objrmap and vmtruncate
From
Date
On Sul, 2003-04-06 at 03:23, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > 14.91s user 75.30s system 24% cpu 6:15.84 total
>
> Isn't the intent to use sys_remap_file_pages for these sort of workloads
> anyway? In which case partial objrmap = rmap for these tests, so we're
> still OK?

What matters is the worst case not the best case. Users will do non
optimal things on a regular basis.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.153 / U:0.868 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site