Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 26 Apr 2003 13:11:46 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.68 and 2.5.68-mm2 |
| |
Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > rwhron@earthlink.net wrote: > >>> The benchmark is hitting a pathologoical case. Yeah, it's a >>> problem, but >>> it's not as bad as tiobench indicates. >>> > Its interesting that deadline does so much better for this case > though. I wonder if any other differences in mm could cause it? > A run with deadline on mm would be nice to see. IIRC my tests > showed AS doing as well or better than deadline in smp tiobench. > The bad random read performance is a problem too, because the > fragmentation should only add to the randomness. > I'll have to investigate this further. > Are you using TCQ by any chance? If so, what do the results look like with TCQ off?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |