Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:06:08 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE & stack location |
| |
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com> writes: >> Is there any good reason we can't remove TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE, and just shove >> libraries directly above the program text? Red Hat seems to have patches to >> dynamically tune it on a per-processes basis anyway ...
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 11:54:56PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Yes. You won't get a continuous sbrk/brk heap then anymore. Not sure it is a > big problem though. > But apparently Solaris/x86 is doing that. > It's probably worth a sysctl at least.
How about a personality? It is a very slightly different ABI.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |