Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Apr 2003 16:32:21 +0200 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: RE:cciss patches for 2.4.21-rc1, 4 of 4 |
| |
On Fri, Apr 25 2003, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 00:12, mikem@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net wrote: > > 20030424 > > > > Changes: > > 1. Sets the DMA mask to 64 bits. Removes RH's code for the DMA mask. > > > > diff -urN lx2421rc1-p3/drivers/block/cciss.c lx2421rc1/drivers/block/cciss.c > > --- lx2421rc1-p3/drivers/block/cciss.c Wed Apr 23 14:40:48 2003 > > +++ lx2421rc1/drivers/block/cciss.c Wed Apr 23 14:51:55 2003 > > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ > > #define NR_CMDS 128 /* #commands that can be outstanding */ > > #define MAX_CTLR 8 > > > > -#define CCISS_DMA_MASK 0xFFFFFFFF /* 32 bit DMA */ > > +#define CCISS_DMA_MASK 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF /* 64 bit DMA */ > > > > static ctlr_info_t *hba[MAX_CTLR]; > > > > @@ -2861,17 +2861,6 @@ > > hba[i]->ctlr = i; > > hba[i]->pdev = pdev; > > > > - /* configure PCI DMA stuff */ > > - if (!pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, (u64) 0xffffffffffffffff)) > > - printk("cciss: using DAC cycles\n"); > > - else if (!pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, (u64) 0xffffffff)) > > - printk("cciss: not using DAC cycles\n"); > > - else { > > - printk("cciss: no suitable DMA available\n"); > > - free_hba(i); > > - return -ENODEV; > > - } > > - > > > this is wrong. The code there is EXACTLY what is needed as per > Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt, removing it is a bug.
Agree, besides, it was never RH code, dunno where that idea came from?
-- Jens Axboe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |