Messages in this thread | | | From | "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <> | Subject | RE: [patch] printk subsystems | Date | Mon, 21 Apr 2003 22:09:18 -0700 |
| |
> From: Karim Yaghmour [mailto:karim@opersys.com] > > "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" wrote: > > > Not meaning to be an smartass here, but I don't buy the "lockless" tag, > > I would agree it is an optimized-lock scheme .... > > > > Although it is not that important, no need to make a fuss out of that :) > > I actually think this is important.
Don't get me wrong - I don't mean the actual difference is not important; what I mean is not important is me buying the "lockless" tag or not. I actually think that the method you guys use is really sharp.
Iñaky Pérez-González -- Not speaking for Intel -- all opinions are my own (and my fault) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |