lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?
From
Date
On Llu, 2003-04-21 at 12:19, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> I can very well accept that argument. What I am trying to do is only make
> _someone_ writing a fs listen to the problem, and maybe - only maybe - in _his_
> fs it is not as complicated and so he simply hacks it in. I am only arguing for
> having a choice. Not more. If e.g. reiserfs had the feature I could simply
> shoot all extX stuff and use my preferred fs all the time. That's just about

You can interest Hans Reiser I'm sure. Just find $100,000.

Its economically saner, better design and a lot more things to just use
md.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.076 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site