Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept? | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 21 Apr 2003 12:52:29 +0100 |
| |
On Llu, 2003-04-21 at 12:19, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > I can very well accept that argument. What I am trying to do is only make > _someone_ writing a fs listen to the problem, and maybe - only maybe - in _his_ > fs it is not as complicated and so he simply hacks it in. I am only arguing for > having a choice. Not more. If e.g. reiserfs had the feature I could simply > shoot all extX stuff and use my preferred fs all the time. That's just about
You can interest Hans Reiser I'm sure. Just find $100,000.
Its economically saner, better design and a lot more things to just use md.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |