[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?
> I wonder whether it would be a good idea to give the linux-fs
> (namely my preferred reiser and ext2 :-) some fault-tolerance.

Fault tollerance should be done at a lower level than the filesystem.

Linux filesystems are used on many different devices, not just hard
disks. Different devices can fail in different ways - a disk might
have a lot of bad sectors in a block, a tape[1] might have a single
track which becomes unreadble, and solid state devices might have get
a few random bits flipped all over them, if a charged particle passes
through them.

The filesystem doesn't know or care what device it is stored on, and
therefore shouldn't try to predict likely failiures.

A RAID-0 array and regular backups are the best way to protect your

[1] Although it is uncommon to use a tape as a block device, you never
know. It's certainly possible, (not necessarily with Linux).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.147 / U:9.596 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site