Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:12:48 -0400 | From | Daniel Jacobowitz <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] detached cloning |
| |
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:29:31AM +0200, J.A. Magallon wrote: > > On 04.08, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 01:09:44AM +0200, J.A. Magallon wrote: > > > > > > On 04.06, J.A. Magallon wrote: > > > > > > > > On 04.04, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > > > > > > So here goes -pre7. Hopefully the last -pre. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fix a crash that can be caused by a CLONE_DETACHED thread. > > > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > > > > [...] > > > > CLONE_DETACHED isn't even in 2.4 except in Red Hat kernels. > > > > But pthreads can spawn detached threads. Can this have any effect ?
Detached threads actually have no relationship to CLONE_DETACHED. In NPTL all threads are CLONE_DETACHED whether they're detached or not; in LinuxThreads they never are, also regardless.
-- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |