[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: PATCH: allow percentile size of tmpfs (2.5.66 / 2.4.20-pre2)
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Daniel Egger wrote:
> Am Die, 2003-04-01 um 18.24 schrieb Christoph Rohland:
> > But on these systems you better use ramfs.
> Just curious: Why? I'm using tmpfs on these systems and I'm rather
> satisfied with it; especially the option to limit the amount of space
> makes it rather useful. According to the documentation ramfs is most
> useful as an educational example how to write filesystems not as a
> real filesystem...

Simply because quite a lot of the tmpfs code is concerned with moving
pages between ram and swap: if you've limited ram and no swap, you may
not want to waste your ram on that code! One day I might try applying
#ifdef CONFIG_SWAPs within mm/shmem.c; but I might well not, it could
get ugly, and looks rudimentary elsewhere - do we intend to get serious


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.066 / U:9.536 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site