[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: struct inode size reduction.
"J.A. Magallon" <> writes:
> That was my point, I do not know if some arch still requires 2.95 in 2.6.
> For 2.4, it states 2.95.3 as minimun.

Even if no arch `requires' gcc 2.95 (I don't really know, though until
recently my arch didn't even _have_ a [working] gcc 3.x port!), there
are certainly a buttload of people _using_ it to build the kernel, so
requiring gcc 3.2, would be kind of obnoxious.

Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here,
beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.030 / U:0.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site