lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: struct inode size reduction.
From
Date
"J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es> writes:
> That was my point, I do not know if some arch still requires 2.95 in 2.6.
> For 2.4, it states 2.95.3 as minimun.

Even if no arch `requires' gcc 2.95 (I don't really know, though until
recently my arch didn't even _have_ a [working] gcc 3.x port!), there
are certainly a buttload of people _using_ it to build the kernel, so
requiring gcc 3.2, would be kind of obnoxious.

-Miles
--
Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here,
beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.030 / U:0.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site