[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] register_blkdev
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 03:11:42PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 00:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > > So we need a maxminors flag in the register for 2.6 I guess ?
> >
> > Do you mean to only increase the number of majors, and not minors then?
> How about an interface that looks like
> register_chr_device(blah. blah, MY_MAX_MINOR);
> and we can delete all the if < 0 || >= MAX return logic from the drivers
> as we go. Right now each driver checks and several in the past had off
> by one errors.

That's a good start, but why not change that to a simple,
HOW_MANY_MINORS_I_WANT, which will work the same way now, but allow us
to change to a pure dynamic major/minor allocation scheme in the future
by only modifying the register_chr_device() code. Same thing for

Although if we increase the width of dev_t then a need for dynamic
major/minors is pretty much gone...


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.081 / U:3.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site