[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2

On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> The thing is, this discussion has _not_ been exactly neutral. You may have
> said "could" or "might" or whatever, but clearly people are trying to
> pressure hpa into going to GPL. It's the whole tone of the thread.
> Or would you disagree with that?

Um, I have to. What I was trying to is to get a clear answer, why he does
not want a different license. All arguments I heard so far don't speak
against a libgcc like license. I only want to know whether there is an
alternative solution he might also be comfortable with.
I don't want to pressure him into anything, I only sort of expect, if
someone makes a decision, which might have farreaching consequences, that
he is able to explain and defend his decision. All I want is that people
sometimes think what consequences their action might have. This is the
point I'm missing here a bit.

bye, Roman

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.042 / U:2.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site