lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 Harald.Schaefer@gls-germany.com wrote:

> * 1. CHS value set by user (whatever user sets will be trusted)
> * 2. LBA value from target drive (require new ATA feature)
> * 3. LBA value from system BIOS (new one is OK, old one may break)
> * 4. CHS value from system BIOS (traditional style)
>
> I think that the priority of LBA from BIOS has to be raised to 2 and the
> priority of LBA from drive should be lowered to 3.
> The mapping-problem only appreared with very new drives in some
> brand-computers using a 240-head mapping from the bios.

I think the chances of a drive knowing its own correct LBA info is far
better than the BIOS getting it right. Many BIOS versions don't understand
large drives.

--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.055 / U:1.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site