[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Multiple & vs. && and | vs. || bugs in 2.4.20

> >
> > - if (!urb->status & !acm->throttle) {
> > + if (!urb->status && !acm->throttle) {
> > for (i = 0; i < urb->actual_length && !acm->throttle; i++) {

> To summarize, I'd probably not be amused if you would change any of my
> code which takes advantage of such programming finess. I would probably
> have added appropriate comments to explain the code but nevertheless,
> replacing the more efficient code with some which is easier to
> understand should probably be considered on a case by case basis.

Actually I feel co-responsible for acm.c,
and this *is* typo. acm is for modems,
thats *not* performance critical, and certainly
not worth code obfuscation.
Written on sharp zaurus, because my Velo1 broke. If you have Velo you don't need...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.056 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site