Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 07 Mar 2003 09:09:32 +0100 | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Subject | Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 |
| |
At 08:45 AM 3/7/2003 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > Weeeeell, FWIW my box (p3-500/128mb/rage128) disagrees. > >UP box, right?
Yes, p3/500 w. 128mb ram and rage128.
> > I can still barely control the box when a make -j5 bzImage is running > > under X/KDE in one terminal and a vmstat (SCHED_RR) in another. I'm not > > swapping, though a bit of idle junk does page out. IOW, I think I'm > > seeing serious cpu starvation. > >which precise scheduler are you using, BK-curr? And to see whether the >problem is related to scheduling at all, could you try to renice X to -10? >[this is not a solution, this is just a test to see the problem is >scheduling related.]
I plugged your combo patch into virgin .64.
>is there any way we could exclude/isolate the VM as the source of >interactivity problems? Eg. any chance to get more RAM into that box?
I can (could with your earlier patches anyway) eliminate the X stalls by setting X junk to SCHED_FIFO. I don't have ram to plug in, but I'm as certain as I can be without actually doing so that it's not ram shortage.
Best would be for other testers to run some tests. With the make -j30 weirdness, I _suspect_ that other oddities (hmm... multi-client db load... query service time) will show.
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |