[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Right, of course. However, the first step (which Greg has accomplished)
> is to get klibc merged into the kernel build. We already have ipconfig
> and mount-nfs binaries which compile against klibc; now we need to
> integrate them so they can pick up the ip= and nfsroot= options and do
> the right thing in userspace.

But before it's actually merged, I would slowly really like to know the
reasoning for license. You completely avoid that question and that makes
me nervous. Why did you choose this license over any GPL variant?
We could as well integrate dietlibc and if anyone has a problem with it,
he can still choose your klibc.
Why should I contribute to klibc instead of dietlibc?

bye, Roman

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.059 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site