[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Greg KH wrote:
> I know it's late, sorry.

Not a huge problem, since I don't think klibc itself is a stability issue.
However, as you say:

> But a lot of code that will need klibc, has not been converted to need
> it yet, due to it not being there :)

Yes. But that's not an argument that flies with me. I really want to see
people actually using it, for real issues (even if they are potentially
_small_ real issues).

I feel that people who want to work on early stuff can easily merge it
themselves (especially if they use BK), and show it to be useful. I don't
have the slightest feeling that work can't be done unless _I_ merge it.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.161 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site