[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: WimMark I for 2.5.64-mm1
Joel Becker <> wrote:
> WimMark I report for 2.5.64-mm1
> Runs with anticipatory scheduler: 547.28 580.69
> Runs with deadline scheduler: 1557.79 1360.52


I have a patch in my inbox which increases NickMark I throughput by 400%, so
it should help this one.

Is the difference between 2.5.64 and 2.5.64-mm1 statistically significant?
(It should be - the readahead changes).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.031 / U:2.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site