[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> > You are avoiding my question. If something goes into the kernel, the
> > kernel license would be the obvious choice. Granting additional rights or
> > using a dual license is a relatively small problem. But you must certainly
> > have a reason to choose a completely different license?
> I gave my reason. You chose not to accept it, but that's not my problem.

Could you please repeat your reasoning? I must have missed something.
So far I'm still trying to understand your choice and I haven't rejected
or accepted anything yet. So far I also tried to be careful not to give
any judgement, you're interpreting something into my words, I didn't
intend to say.

bye, Roman

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.091 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site