[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2

    On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

    > > You are avoiding my question. If something goes into the kernel, the
    > > kernel license would be the obvious choice. Granting additional rights or
    > > using a dual license is a relatively small problem. But you must certainly
    > > have a reason to choose a completely different license?
    > I gave my reason. You chose not to accept it, but that's not my problem.

    Could you please repeat your reasoning? I must have missed something.
    So far I'm still trying to understand your choice and I haven't rejected
    or accepted anything yet. So far I also tried to be careful not to give
    any judgement, you're interpreting something into my words, I didn't
    intend to say.

    bye, Roman

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.030 / U:1.088 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site