Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:06:53 +0100 | From | Alex Riesen <> | Subject | Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64-mm1 |
| |
Joel Becker, Fri, Mar 07, 2003 18:57:01 +0100: > > WimMark I report for 2.5.64-mm1 > > Runs with anticipatory scheduler: 547.28 580.69 > Runs with deadline scheduler: 1557.79 1360.52
What do the numbers mean? Is AS better or worse DS?
> WimMark I is a rough benchmark we have been running > here at Oracle against various kernels. Each run tests an OLTP > workload on the Oracle database with somewhat restrictive memory > conditions. This reduces in-memory buffering of data, allowing for > more I/O. The I/O is read and sync write, random and seek-laden. > The benchmark is called "WimMark I" because it has no > official standing and is only a relative benchmark useful for comparing > kernel changes. The benchmark is normalized an arbitrary kernel, which > scores 1000.0. All other numbers are relative to this. > The machine in question is a 4 way 700 MHz Xeon machine with 2GB > of RAM. CONFIG_HIGHMEM4GB is selected. The disk accessed for data is a > 10K RPM U2W SCSI of similar vintage. Unless mentioned, all runs are > on this machine (variation in hardware would indeed change the > benchmark). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |