[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)

On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:34:52 +0100 (MET) Szakacsits Szabolcs <> wrote:

> | Anyway, considering how bogus the oops was and Randy already had two
> | oops'es before this NTFS one, I think the NTFS driver was a sufferer
> | of other trouble(s) than the originator. So unless one can reproduce
> | something close to this one (or Randy sends his first [two] oops), I
> | would just trash
> |
> |
> I must have missed something here. What other 2 oopses are you referring to?

Quoting from your report:

==> Mar 1 13:35:44 midway kernel: Oops: 0002

This means oops counter is 2. So there were two oopses before with
counter value 0 and 1.

> As for closing bug reports because they are not reproducible...

No. Not because it's not reproducible however because it's untrustable
and bogus. Unless as I mentioned before ... please see above. Thanks!


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.104 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site